South China Sea Dispute: China To ‘Pressure’ America Regarding Maritime Issues

South China Sea Dispute: China To ‘Pressure’ America Regarding Maritime Issues
US President Barack Obama during a bilateral meeting with Chinese President Xi Jinping U.S. Embassy The Hague / Flickr CC BY-ND 2.0
Be First to Share ->
Share on Facebook
Share on Twitter
Share on Google+
Share on LinkedIn
Pin to Pinterest
Share on StumbleUpon
What's This?

When the US holds talks with China for a Strategic and Economic Dialogue next week, one can expect China to raise the issue of the South China Sea. In fact, sources indicate that Beijing would put “pressure” on the U.S. with regard to maritime issues involving U.S. military presence along disputed territories in the said area.


Recently, there have been a number of incidents involving the U.S. and Chinese military. The U.S. has always maintained that it was only exercising freedom of navigation along international waters, a right that everyone is entitled too. In contrast, the Chinese have argued that such freedom is restricted when it comes to military vessels. Both argue that they are making their points valid based on the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS).

Today, a report from Reuters revealed that state-run newspaper China Daily says that “Beijing will pressure Washington” concerning maritime matters during their upcoming meeting. According to the Chinese Foreign Ministry, it is also hoped that the upcoming talks will “follow the spirit” of an earlier meeting between President Xi Jinping and President Barack Obama.

According to Chinese spokeswoman Hua Chunying, the goal is to “strengthen communication and mutual trust, manage and control disputes, expand cooperation, and move forward the new type of major-country relationship between China and the US.”

Like us on Facebook

On the other hand, the State Department also believes that the upcoming talks would be a good venue to discuss several matters concerning the U.S.’ relationship with China.

Assistant Secretary of State for East Asian and Pacific Affairs Danny Russel also says it would allow both sides to discuss issues like NGO management laws, restrictions on human rights as well as “concerns with Chinese behavior in the South China Sea.”

Furthermore, Russel believes that the Strategic and Economic dialogue is “capable of absorbing stress” from the U.S.-China relationship.

Also read: South China Sea War: China Accuses U.S. Of Treating Tension Like Some ‘Hollywood Blockbuster’

If you want more World news, subscribe to our newsletter or follow us on Twitter and Facebook.


  • britbob

    Effective sovereignty Argument Uninhabited Islands: A case that supports this view of effective sovereignty is relevant is the Minquiers and Ecrehos Case, France/UK of 17th November 1953. In this case both the UK and France had requested the ICJ to determine which country held sovereignty over the uninhabited Islets and rocks in the Minquiers and Ecrehos. France had claimed sovereignty because of historic sovereignty going back to the Dutchy of Normandy in the 11th century while the UK claimed that Jersey had historically exercised administrational jurisdiction on them. The Court decided that in the absence of valid treaty provisions, they considered the argument that the British government has exercised effective control to be superior, so that sovereignty control over the Minquiers and Ecrehos belonged to the UK. (the UK had protested to the French government when a French national had intended to build a house on one of the islats and any deaths occurring on the islets were dealt with by inquests held on Jersey). ICJ Minquiers & Ecrehos Judgment, 17 Nov 1953, p28, paras 6 & 12.

    No delimitation between states with opposite or adjacent coasts may be affected unilaterally by one of those states. For some interesting judgments on territorial seas and to gain an understanding as to how the world court deals with such disputes: –